The nature of justice is complex and particularly so when considering both social and environmental justice within the context of irem.

We need to answer this question in a form of an essay using the document provided. No outside research. 825 words
The nature of justice is complex and particularly so when considering both social and environmental justice within the context of IREM.
In this essay, I want you to discuss the dimensions of justice as these apply to IREM.
Begin by defining the role of justice in decision-making and the four types of justice.
Then outline who/what should be considered when considering questions of justice.
Finally, how does or should environmental justice influence IREM decisions and actions?

In this essay, i want you to discuss the dimensions of justice as these apply to irem.

We have to answer both questions (825 words each) using the documents provided. Two citations should be fine. No outside research.
Question 1 (Unit 1, transcript 1 and 2 pdf): In unit 1 we focussed on the real-world conditions that determine how we conduct IREM. This was summarised as turbulence.
In this essay, I want you to explain how turbulence defines IREM actions:
Begin by defining what turbulence is.
Then present Mitchell’s 4-C’s and connect these to Trist and Christensen.
Finally, what are implications of increased turbulence on IREM planning and praxis?
Question 2 (Unit 2 pdf): The nature of justice is complex and particularly so when considering both social and environmental justice within the context of IREM. In this essay, I want you to discuss the dimensions of justice as these apply to IREM.
Begin by defining the role of justice in decision-making and the four types of justice.
Then outline who/what should be considered when considering questions of justice.
Finally, how does or should environmental justice influence IREM decisions and actions?

In the task, you will present the findings of the gis investigation in a poster that investigates the potential for ecological connectivity in the landscape.

This project is an Academic Poster in which you discuss both the broad topic of ecological connectivity and then present recommendations about how to maintain connectivity in the study location. **This requires GIS practical knowledge to complete. In the task, you will present the findings of the GIS investigation in a poster that investigates the potential for ecological connectivity in the landscape. The attached files below give additional information on the assessment. cheers

When adjusted for the higher needs of low-income students, pennsylvania’s highest poverty school districts receive 17% less per student than the districts with the lowest poverty.

Instruction: I need a 1 page Abstract on the the reason and causes of inequities through Pa school districts.
Solutions: to address the issues of unstable tax revenue from the wealthy area and allow all school district to afford the same right and educations.
* you can add to a for solid reasoning and stronger foundation if you think it needs it.
You can pull from other sources for any information needed , but please stick to the Pennsylvania school districts.
Link:
Education Funding in Pennsylvania: Inadequate, Inequitable …https://www.elc-pa.org › uploads › 2021/05 › PA
link to information:https://krc-pbpc.org/research_publication/the-state-of-school-funding-inequality-in-pa/
Waslala Miranda | 04/03/2015
Blog / The Education Trust, an independent national education policy organization, recently released a report on the nation’s growing funding inequalities between wealthy and low-income school districts. The study reveals that Pennsylvania has the second-worst funding gap among states. When adjusted for the higher needs of low-income students, Pennsylvania’s highest poverty school districts receive 17% less per student than the districts with the lowest poverty.
To understand this statistic, we need to look at how state and local funding of schools works in Pennsylvania. Currently, the commonwealth has no funding formula that distributes money based on the needs of a school district or its students. At 38%, the state share of funding puts us in the bottom 10 of states nationally. This is part of a long-term trend of the state paying a smaller and smaller share, leaving local communities to fund the balance. As local wealth greatly varies across the state, so does the chance that a child will receive an adequate education, which is a basic right.
Below we can see the result: Instead of having a system that matches funding with need, we have one in which the poorer a school district is, the less funding it receives. Adjusting for the higher needs of low-income students, the poorest school districts receive almost $2,500 less per student than the wealthiest districts.
The Education Trust analysis
This is a problem that affects the whole state when you realize how common student poverty is. In 2013-14, nearly half of all public school children in Pennsylvania, 44%, qualified for free- or reduced-price lunch, an indicator of student poverty. Half of all school districts had student poverty rates of 40% or higher. These funding inequalities affect the core mission of public education: to promote academic achievement and an engaged citizenry. Pennsylvania needs to return to a funding formula that gives every child a realistic chance to succeed in school and life.

Reflection Paper Instructions Reflection papers are required for three of the fo

Reflection Paper Instructions
Reflection papers are required for three of the four class topics (sets of modules) that you complete this quarter.
You may choose which three of the topics that you would like use for your three reflection papers.
The paper deadline for each topic is prior to midnight (11:59pm) on the Saturday immediately following the Friday conclusion of the topic.
Your assignment when writing a reflection paper is write an original essay in which you weave together each of the sets of content that we cover in any given topic and introduce something new (an artifact) to the discussion that you have found outside of the assigned course material. This might be an example from the real-world that fits into the conversation we’ve had during the topic, an article from another source that you deem particularly relevant, a news story that you have uncovered that ties into the material, etc.
In any event, the artifact that you introduce in your reflection paper must fit clearly into the narrative that you write. You must also properly cite the artifact that you introduce (web address, article citation, etc.).
There is not a specific question that I am interested for you to answer in your reflection paper, as the assignment is for you to reflect on the content, introduce an artifact, and compose an essay in which you document your reflections.
A reflection paper is, therefore, a particular type of written response that engages substantively (via a claim, argument, or observation) with the content from the articles being reflected upon. The following parameters are provided as a guide for you to use when writing:
Content: Make an original claim, argument, or observation using the material presented in each of the topic’s articles (which are found in the modules). In your paper, you must tie all of the topic’s modules together in some way. You need not write in opposition to the assigned readings, but your paper must engage with the articles in a thoughtful, critical way – simply restating the hypotheses, methods, and conclusions of the assigned readings is not sufficient.
Evidence and References: You must include at least one direct quote (and citation) from at least three of the articles in the topic’s modules (which means that you’re responsible for including a minimum of three quotes). Quotes should serve as evidence to advance or support the claims that you make in your paper – they must, in other words, be a substantive element of your argument. It is not sufficient to simply tack a quotation onto the beginning or end of a paragraph without discussing it, providing context, or otherwise weaving it into your argument.
Artifact: Your paper must include an artifact from an external source that provides context, support, or evidence to your claim or argument. The artifact must be properly cited and woven into the text of your paper. Simply tacking a final paragraph onto the end of your paper in which you describe a news item is not sufficient.
Style: These papers should be free from grammatical and spelling errors, and are expected to be written in a formal style. Avoid using stream of consciousness, bulleted lists, slang, informal punctuation, etc. Should you need additional assistance with your writing, I strongly encourage you to visit the UWT writing center.
Length: 1,000 – 1,500 words

Please respond to at least two (2) other students. Responses should be substan

Please respond to at least two (2) other students.
Responses should be substantial, and show that you’ve engaged with post you’re responding to.
You can do this by asking direct questions or adding your own insight to points raised in the post you are responding to.
Be sure to include at least two scholarly formatted references.
Please use in-text citations.
This week’s topic: Issue: 2.4 – Can “Green” Marketing Claims Be Believed?
Directions: Be sure to read both the for and against articles for this Issue topic. In your discussion board write up you should provide feedback for one side or the other, or both sides if you so choose. No matter the position you select you must be clear as to what you are articulating to your reader and be sure to use at two (2) references outside of the required textbook.
Be sure to include at least two scholarly formatted references for initial post. Please use in-text citations.
Response 1 – (at least 60 words) simple postive response
Maily
RE: Forum #6: Issue – 2.4 – Can “Green” Marketing Claims Be Believed?
When a company spends more effort and money on portraying itself as environmentally friendly than on actually reducing its environmental impact, this is known as “greenwashing.” It’s a dishonest marketing ploy used to deceive customers who prefer to purchase goods and services from companies who care about the environment. Examples would be brands that use words like “eco-friendly,” “ethically created,” and “non-toxic,” together with audacious advertising claims and environmental power plays, to try to make you think their organization is so progressive that their office is carbon-neutral. Their crew exclusively consumes locally grown organic vegetables. You’re making paper straws to replace your plastic ones, but then you inform us that they aren’t made from recyclable paper. Greenwashing. While claiming that your clothes are produced in a “fair supply chain,” have you been caught using unpaid garment workers? Greenwashing. These are a few examples of how greenwashing is used.
Response 2 – (at least 60 words) simple postive response
Michael
RE: Forum #6: Issue – 2.4 – Can “Green” Marketing Claims Be Believed?
Greek marking claims or simply greenwashing “is not a recent phenomenon, since the mid-1980s the term has gained broad recognition and acceptance to describe the practice of making unwarranted or overblown claims of sustainability or environmental friendliness in a attempt to gain market share” (Easton-Dahl). In my opinion I believe it is a dishonest practice however I do think these advertisements have a neutral impact on society people may argue that these advertisements do spread awareness to environmental issues that should be addressed but as you will soon see the amount of people taking this information seriously is very low, according to articulate 68% of all advertisements make up facts or exaggerate the truth, they explain how “Credibility and authority are key to effective marketing”(Articulate) and “Just as orators can speak for hours without actually saying anything, brands disseminate hyperbolic ‘facts’ so widely that customers tend to either block them out or conversely see them as proof of a brand’s lack of credibility and authority.”(Articulate). Companies have reached a point were people are subconsciously ignoring the statistics if they are real or not. So while it may seem like they are trying to help spread the word get more information out about the environment it will end up having little to no effect on the population. I think that these advertisements and greenwashing only benefits the companies and does not do enough justice to spread awareness to the people, however if companies do use true and verifiable facts it can also be a positive for the company to show how far they have come in becoming more green.